Showing results for mid2024 monnet promo code matte
FPF AARNET Youth Privacy in Australia
[…] all designed to meet the unique and changing nee ds of research and education. AARNet works closely with the research and education sector, industry, and government to promote a safe and secure internet environment, fostering innovation while protecting the integrity of Australia’s digital infrastructure. Learn more at arnet.edu.au YOUTH PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM […]
Comparison of COPPA 2.0
[…] case, the operator is deemed to have collected the information); and 2 (B) does not include any organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev enue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code . nonprofit entity that would otherwise be exempt from coverage under section 45 of […]
Comparative table_ EU AI Act – South Korea AI Framework Act – Japan AI Promotion Act (2)
[…] an d te xt p ub lis h e d wit h th e p urp ose to in fo rm th e p ub lic on matte rs of pub lic A I Busin e ss Opera to rs must n o tif y u se rs in ad va n ce whe […]
Rethinking Personal Data: The CJEU’s Contextual Turn in EDPS vs. SRB
[…] and ownership of Banco Popular instruments. Those deemed eligible could then submit comments through an online form. More than 23,000 comments were received, each assigned an alphanumeric code. In June 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or […]
FPF_CCPA Regulations Issue Brief
[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]
The State of State AI 2025
[…] Beyond disclosure and safety, some bills experimented with accountability measures tied to privacy and advertising . Utah’s SB 452 (enacted), for example, prohibits mental health chatbots from promoting products during conversations unless clearly labeled as advertising. California’s AB 1064 (enrolled) initially highlighted concerns about how personal data from chatbot interactions w ith youth may […]
FPF-Comment-Letter-Colorado-Minor-Privacy-Protections-Rulemaking_9.10.25
[…] se rv ic e to M in o rs , co nsid erin g diff ere nt fa cto rs su ch as su b je ct matte r, vis u al co nte nt, la n g uag e, an d use of M in o r-o rie nte d activ it ie […]
Concepts in AI Governance_ Personality vs. Personalization
[…] m ent an d g am in g , s o cia l sk ills d eve lo pm ent , o r sim ply as a matte r of o fferin g ch o ic e s base d on a use r’s p ers o nal pre fe re nce s. In […]
“Personality vs. Personalization” in AI Systems: Intersection with Evolving U.S. Law (Part 3)
[…] through user-generated input. For example, a 2015 claim against Snap, Inc. survived Section 230 dismissal following a claim that a specific “Speed Filter” Snapchat feature (since discontinued) promoted reckless driving. In other cases, the personalization of a system through demographic-based targeting that causes harm may also implicate tort and product liability law when organizations […]
“Personality vs. Personalization” in AI Systems: Specific Uses and Concrete Risks (Part 2)
[…] personality-like features, whether it is a specific voice mode, or a consistent persona, or even a range of “AI companions.” Even if companion-like personalities are not directly promoted as features, users can build them using system prompts and customized design; an early 2023 feature of OpenAI enabled users to create custom GPTs. Figure 3 […]